Methods:
Design
A matrix of 56 circular subplots was established within the center 30m x 30m section of each of the 8 study plots. Subplot radius is 1.125m (4m2 area), giving a 25% sample of the center section of each plot. Subplot centers were marked with blue flags on wire stakes.
Sampling
Within the matrix of 2.25m diameter subplots, browsing was assessed on all woody stems (including shrubs except for Rubus sp.) more than 30cm and less than 3m in height and up to 5 cm DBH. The height class of the stem was recorded (30-99cm, 1m-2m, and 2-3m). Presence/absence of browse was assessed for each stem, presence/absence of browse greater than 2m in height was noted for stems greater than 2m high, and presence/absence of browsed stems greater than 5mm in diameter was recorded on stems that had twigs greater than 5mm in diameter. Browsing data provide the proportion of stems of each woody plant species browsed and some sense the relative importance of moose vs deer browsing.
Plot-level observations during the 2008 survey
Plot 1: No saplings in suplots 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 15, 19, 23, 24, 32, 33, 41, 48, 55, 56; moose scat observed; deer (?) scat observed, unless it is very small moose scat; subplots 9, 11 have browsed seedlings less than 30cm tall.
Plot 2: No saplings in subplot 7,22; Aralia hispidis dominant in subplot 20, not browsed; browsed in subplot 29; rubus browsed in subplot 2,14.
Plot 3: No saplings in subplot 1-3,5-8,9-16,19-24,25-32,33-40,41-56
Plot 4: No saplings in subplots 5,13,14,41,42,43,44,49,50,51; moose scat observed; deer and moose scat observed in subplot 8; Aralia hispidis browsed in subplot 20
Plot 5: No saplings in subplots 16,29,30,31,32,37,38,39,40,44,46,47,48
Plot 6: No saplings in subplots1-16,9-14,47-50,54-56
Plot 7: No sapling in subplots 6,27; Vaccinium observed as highbush or lowbush in subplot 7
Plot 8: Subplot 8: ACRU growing from base of tree