 |
Headwater Habitat Streams in Central Massachusetts
HF095 EML Publications Archive
Data
Overview
-
Lead: Elizabeth Colburn
-
Investigators: J. Choiniere, Cindy Dunn, H. Jensen-Herrin, D. Williams
-
Contact: Elizabeth Colburn
-
Start date: 2002-08-01
-
End date: 2005-12-31
-
Location: Prospect Hill Tract (Harvard Forest) and Mt. Wachusett (Princeton MA)
-
Latitude: +42.48 to +42.55
-
Longitude: -72.20 to -71.88
-
Elevation:
-
Taxa:
-
Research topic: regional, watershed
-
Study type: short-term measurement
-
LTER core area: disturbance
-
Keywords: conservation, headwater streams, intermittent streams, perennial streams, temporary streams, temporary waters, volunteer monitoring
-
Release date: 2006
-
EML version: knb-lter-hfr.95.9
-
Revisions:
-
Related links:
-
Abstract:
Headwater streams, particularly those that flow only during part of the year, are understudied and underprotected in Massachusetts. Research being conducted elsewhere suggests that these "Headwater Habitat Streams" are important both for aquatic biodiversity and for ecological function of lower stream reaches. We are carrying out baseline research, involving research scientists and volunteers, on hydrology and habitat characteristics in headwater streams in northern Worcester County, MA.
We hypothesized that headwater streams exhibit a longitudinal gradient of hydrology, from (1) ephemeral channels that flow only in response to storms, through (2) intermittent sections that flow seasonally until the groundwater table falls below the channel and are dry the rest of the year, to (3) interstitial reaches that flow seasonally and retain pools connected by subsurface flow during the summer, to (4) the perennial stream. Results to date show a high degree of longitudinal heterogeneity in the study streams, with interspersion of perennially flowing reaches among low-gradient sections of vegetated wetland, high-gradient boulder piles, and braided channels. Perennial flow is found high up in some watersheds.
We expect our methods and results will have implications throughout the Commonwealth for local conservation commissions and other municipal officials responsible for land-use planning and regulation, state agencies responsible for land management and the protection of wildlife, regulators reviewing projects affecting streams, watershed managers, teachers and their students, private land trusts, conservation advocates, and citizen-naturalists.
-
Methods:
Starting in late summer of 2002, we carried out habitat surveys in headwater tributaries of 15 perennial streams in central Massachusetts. Each of 36 headwaters was flagged at 20-m intervals. Using a modification of the field procedures established by Ohio EPA (2002) for assessment of headwater streams, we recorded habitat characteristics such as flow, gradient, substrate (percent boulder, cobble, sand, leaf dams, etc.), channel conditions (pool, riffle, cascade, etc.), riparian vegetation, and adjacent land use for each 20-m reach of each tributary.
-
Use:
This dataset is released to the public and may be freely downloaded. Please keep the designated Contact person informed of any plans to use the dataset. Consultation or collaboration with the original investigators is strongly encouraged. Publications and data products that make use of the dataset must include proper acknowledgement. For more information on LTER Network data access and use policies, please see: http://www.lternet.edu/data/netpolicy.html.
-
Citation:
Colburn E. 2006. Headwater Habitat Streams in Central Massachusetts. Harvard Forest Data Archive: HF095.
Detailed Metadata
hf095-01: stream habitat data
- Date: sampling date (YYYY-MM-DD)
- ID: Tributary name and meter location along streamlength; each stream has a 2-3 letter code, followed by a letter identifying the headwater tributary (if more than one tributary) and a number identifying the location along the streambank (in meters above confluence with pond, road, or larger stream). A single number indicates a quadrat sample at the location indicated; numbers separated by a dash indicate sampling along a transect (usually 20 m in length).
- Depth: water depth at sampling location (centimeter
)
- NumWidth: average width of stream channel (bank to bank) (meter
)
- I/Pflow: whether flow is intermittent or perennial at the sampling location
- 1: perennial
- 2: intermittent
- M2inTransect/quadrat: square meters sampled, in quadrat or transect (squareMeter
)
- Bldr/bedrock%: percent of substrate occupied by bedrock or large embedded boulder (dimensionless
)
- Boulder%: percent of substrate occupied by bedrock or large embedded boulder (dimensionless
)
- Cobble%: percent of substrate occupied by cobble (dimensionless
)
- Gravel%: percent of substrate occupied by gravel (dimensionless
)
- Sand%: percent of substrate occupied by sand (dimensionless
)
- Silt%: percent of substrate occupied by silt (dimensionless
)
- Leafpack%: percent of substrate occupied by leaf pack (dimensionless
)
- WoodyDebris%: percent of substrate occupied by coarse woody debris (dimensionless
)
- Clay/hardpan: percent of substrate occupied by clay or hardpan (dimensionless
)
- Artificial: percent of substrate occupied by artificial surface (culvert, etc.) (dimensionless
)
- UnscouredForestFloor%: percent of substrate representing unscoured forest floor (not defined channel) (dimensionless
)
- ScouredForestFloor%: percent of substrate representing scoured forest floor (not defined channel) (dimensionless
)
- EmbeddednessOfSubstrate: degree to which fine materials surround course materials in substrate of channel
- 1: low
- 2: medium
- 3: high
- na: no data
- Pools%: percent of habitat consisting of pool (dimensionless
)
- Cascade%: percent of habitat in cascade (dimensionless
)
- Run%: percent of run habitat (dimensionless
)
- Riffle%: percent of riffle habitat (dimensionless
)
- Moss%: percent of moss habitat (dimensionless
)
- Roots%: percent of substrate representing unscoured forest floor (not defined channel) (dimensionless
)
- DebrisPiles%: percent of habitat consisting of debris piles (dimensionless
)
- Damp/drySand%: percent of habitat consisting of damp or dry sand (dimensionless
)
- Damp/dryRocks%: percent of habitat consisting of damp or dry rocks (dimensionless
)
- RiparianZoneL: Width of riparian area on left (L) side of stream as look upstream
- 0: none
- 1: narrow, less than 5 m
- 2: moderate, 5-10 m
- 3: wide, more than 10 m
- RiparianZoneR: Width of riparian area on right (R) side of stream as look upstream
- 0: none
- 1: narrow, less than 5 m
- 2: moderate, 5-10 m
- 3: wide, more than 10 m
- BankQual: qualitative measure of bank disturbance
- 1: undisturbed
- 2: cleared
- 3: eroded/cut
- 4: riprapped
- LandUsesL: description of land uses adjacent to the stream, on left (L) as look upstream
- 0: undisturbed
- 1: paved road
- 2: dirt road/trail
- LandUsesR: description of land uses adjacent to the stream, on right (R) as look upstream
- 0: undisturbed
- 1: paved road
- 2: dirt road/trail
- AdjacentHabitatL: dominant characteristics of riparian zone on each side of stream (left as look upstream)
- 1: deciduous forest
- 2: mixed forest
- 3: coniferous forest
- 4: wooded wetland
- AdjacentHabitatR: dominant characteristics of riparian zone on each side of stream (right as look upstream)
- 2: mixed forest
- 3: coniferous forest
- 4: wooded wetland
- 6: cleared/cut forest
- Sinuosity: number of curves in study reach (number
)
- Gradient: stream gradient
- 1: flat
- 2: flat to moderate
- 3: moderate
- 4: moderate to severe
- 5: severe
- FlowChar: flow at time of sampling
- 1: dry channel no water
- 3: pools, damp streambed between, flow not evident OR moist channel, isolated pools, no flow
- 4: pools, areas of intermittent flow and dry/damp areas
- 6: flowing continuously
- DistanceFromPond: distance along stream channel upstream of pond or other starting point
- 1: 0-50 m
- 2: 50-100 m
- 3: 100-150 m
- 6: 250-300 m
- 7: 300-350 m
- 8: 350-400 m
- 9: 400-450 m
- 10: 450-500 m
- 11: 500-550 m
- NA: no data
- Elevation: elevation above msl (meter
)
|